nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBN/GTEI


From: Tuomas Toivonen <toivotuo () fishpool com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 18:11:28 +0300

On Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 10:50:58AM -0700, steve () altrina exodus net wrote:
Uh, huh, this is not quite the real world. I certainly would like to see a
corporate marketing dude even considering that. If connectivity to cust-a
(surfer) sucks then cust-b will take net-b by the throat and demand
something to be done (in essence net-b will pay settlement to net-a or lose
cust-b).

      Realizing that most large co-located websites are in facilities or
at network providers who have many OTHER large co-located websites, the 
chances are great that cust-a will notice slow or no connectivity to MANY
websites.  Who do you think he will blame? :

a.) net-a
b.) net-b
c.) cust-b

      Of course net-a, he pays net-a $$ for connectivity, the customer will
not take many 'its on their side' answers from net-a, he will demand that net-a
fix his connectivity or he will leave.

Yes, but when cust-a has bad connectivity to cust-b (and other co-located
sites) I would see net-b receiving pressure from cust-b to improve
connectivity to net-a. When customer is able to make demands to provider
money has exchanged hands and provider has (should with a viable business
model) means to pay settlement.

-- 
tuomas.toivonen () fishpool fi               fishpool creations ltd
http://www.kasvua.org/~toivotuo/          http://www.fishpool.fi/


Current thread: