nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN/GTEI
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 10:50:04 -0700
What about the people who got letters about shutting off their public peering? What will they revert to?
Would everyone who has received such a letter from some peer and who is running defaultless please send me some mail? I'm willing to go under NDA if that's the only way you can legally part with the information. I'd like to be able to report back to NANOG the number of such events which are now pending, even if I'm disallowed by NDA from naming names. Right now it's just a rumour. I'm willing to help upgrade it to a fact.
Current thread:
- Re: BBN/GTEI, (continued)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Mike Leber (Aug 21)
- Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement John Curran (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Adrian Chadd (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Patrick Greenwell (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Michael Dillon (Aug 21)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Paul Vixie (Aug 24)
- Re: BBN/GTEI steve (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Paul A Vixie (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI alex (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI Kevin Oberman (Aug 25)
- RE: BBN/GTEI Charles Sprickman (Aug 25)
- Re: BBN/GTEI steve (Aug 25)