nanog mailing list archives

Re: Traffic Engineering


From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat () traveller com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 22:45:32 -0500 (CDT)

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:

C'mon, Vadim.  As the Net, and the Web in particular, grow more
geographically dense -- IE: as there _is_ more local stuff for users to
look at -- they _will_; people are natively more interested in that
which is near to them geographically.

And unless we unload that traffic from the backbones and the NAP's,
_it_ will be what melts down the net.

Well, a better way to handle that particular problem is simply to peer 
locally with other ISPs.  We do that here in Huntsville, peering with 3 
of the other ISPs in town, and between the 4 of us we probably have 85% of
the local customers.  The peering links are over ATM (for one who is a 
customer) or FR (so they are essentially free given the way BellSouth's
FR network is designed).  We would be willing to peer with the smaller
ones as long as they were willing to run BGP4, which they find difficult 
on the equivalent of a Cisco 2501 :).

In our other cities, we are trying to arrange similar peering connections.

John Tamplin                                    Traveller Information Services
jat () Traveller COM                            2104 West Ferry Way
205/883-4233x7007                               Huntsville, AL 35801



Current thread: