nanog mailing list archives
Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs
From: smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: 29 May 1997 11:23:15 -0400
"Kent W. England" <kwe () 6SigmaNets com> writes:
If the ISP community doesn't address the email problem with protocols and technical solutions
Precisely. The current stack of email protocols are the problem here; it's been known for what, fifteen years, that Internet email is trivially forgeable and can be used to generate spectacular denials-of-service.
, then the legislators will respond to their constituents with regulations.
It's sad that apparently the Internet has evolved to the point where politicians move faster than standards-makers. Sean. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs, (continued)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs John R Levine (May 24)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Phil Howard (May 24)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Pete Kruckenberg (May 24)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Stephen Sprunk (May 25)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Phil Howard (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs J.D. Falk (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs J.D. Falk (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Tony Torzillo (May 27)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs J.D. Falk (May 28)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Owen DeLong (May 27)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Dory Ethan Leifer (May 28)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs J.D. Falk (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Kent W. England (May 29)