Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs

[Phil Howard <phil () charon milepost com>]

Stephen Sprunk writes...

> I think that the burden should be placed entirely on the spammer; there is
> no reason to bother the user or the ISP with this mess.
>
> The current US law (USC Title 47 Sec 227) governing commercial
> telecommunications should be strengthened to explicitly include email.

Then all the spammers just migrate across the border.  I already get spam
from Canada and Europe.


> Out of curiosity, has anyone considered the effect of this law (or others)
> on non-profit spam?

Or has anyone considered the effect of this law on spammers outside of the
United States?

-- 
Phil Howard KA9WGN   +-------------------------------------------------------+
Linux Consultant     |  Linux installation, configuration, administration,   |
Milepost Services    |  monitoring, maintenance, and diagnostic services.    |
phil at milepost.com +-------------------------------------------------------+
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -