nanog mailing list archives

Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)


From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 11:23:38 +0000

On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:32:03 -0500 
 "Justin W. Newton" <justin () erols com> wrote:

A BGP withdrawl for a route which is not in the routing table does not
cause the router to update any routes and is hence not a routing update.
I.e. removing a route that isn't there is not very processor intensive.

Thats irrelevent, what it is doing is _broken_ and it should be fixed and
implemented.

Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.       Domino: In the glow of the night.
neil () DOMINO ORG        NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) 
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: