nanog mailing list archives
Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
From: "John W. Stewart III" <jstewart () metro isi edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:39:15 EST
CSCdi75464, integrated in 11.1(7)CA and 11.1(7.3) mainline. This is an optimization, not a bug fix, although I'm sure skeptics would subjectively argue otherwise.How can you claim that this isn't a bug?
if you think it's a bug, then a fix is available if you think it's an optimization, then the new code is available why are we still talking about this? /jws - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?), (continued)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Hank Nussbacher (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Tony Li (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Dorian R. Kim (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Avi Freedman (Jan 15)