nanog mailing list archives
Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
From: jon () branch net (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 12:46:49 -0500 (EST)
0) Is this a bug, does it cause any problem whatsoever?
If I'm not mistaken, lots of routers have had performance problems caused by excessive rates of routing updates. Or did I misread various previous messages to this list?
I've looked at the Cisco page, and a search on "BGP, withdrawals" does not find any mention of the bug fix release. So, I have some pointed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) William Allen Simpson (Jan 13)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Randy Bush (Jan 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) William Allen Simpson (Jan 13)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 13)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Dorian R. Kim (Jan 13)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Jeff Young (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Jon Zeeff (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Hank Nussbacher (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Tony Li (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Dorian R. Kim (Jan 14)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)