nanog mailing list archives

Re: Just got on this thing (perhaps very belatedly) - root server trouble?


From: "Brett L. Hawn" <blh () nol net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 18:05:46 -0600 (CST)

On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Matt Ranney wrote:

BTW, churn is the right word.  Its taking anywhere from 5-10 *seconds* to
come back as NXDOMAIN on each request for those that fail to resolve, and
this is from the IANA roots.

So aside from programs like yours, who ever asks for domains that
aren't in use?  

Plenty of folks do, some gomer registers a domain, doesn't tell his upstream
about it, doesn't do DNS for it, but hands out an email address of
joe@my.*&^ed.domain.com, they try and email him.. you get the picture. Day
after day we see dozens of lame delegation errors. Very often for the same
domains time and time again. I don't usually agree with Karl but in this
case he's right.

This IS a functional problem - and worse, all those non-existant zones and
the VM churn they generate on the COM TLD servers is probably the REASON
that we're looking at this kind of horrid performance!

Thats fair, I guess.  Perhaps some of those $100 in fees for unused
domains could be used to buy more RAM for root server operators.

Or better yet, to teach the idiots at NSI how to maintain a database.


[-]                Brett L. Hawn (blh @ nol dot net)                       [-]
[-]                Networks On-Line - Houston, Texas                       [-]
[-]                           713-467-7100                                 [-]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: