nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering versus Transit
From: Sanjay Dani(maillists) <indus () professionals com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () quake net> Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net> wrote:WRT the former, I simply cannot fathom, and no one other than Sean has yet presented an argument explaining why it's malicious to deliver a packet to its addressee's ISP.You should always add "without consent of the said ISP". It is no different from dumping a pile of bricks at somebody's property.
Why is it any different than the big ISP's customers dumping packets on small ISP's web server? Sanjay. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering versus Transit, (continued)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Jeff Young (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matthew Kaufman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Doran (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Barney Wolff (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Barney Wolff (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit William Allen Simpson (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael Dillon (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alex.Bligh (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matt Zimmerman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Donelan (Sep 30)
(Thread continues...)