nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering versus Transit
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () quake net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 19:05:26 -0700
Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net> wrote:
That's a repetition of the same position that's been stated over and over, without justification. If A sends to B directly in the absence of an advertised route, A is "stealing" resources from B. If B sends to A indirectly through A's transit provider, then B is "stealing" resources from A. What makes the former case worse in your mind than the latter, when it results in higher reliability, lower cost, and a sounder architecture?
I'm sorry if you are unable to comprehend the difference between going to somebody's place when you were given a key and going to the same place without consent of its owner. And it doesn't matter at all if you want to throw out their old TV and replace it with one offering higher reliability, lower cost and a sounder architecture. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering versus Transit, (continued)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael Dillon (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alex.Bligh (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matt Zimmerman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Donelan (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alan Hannan (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Eric Sobocinski (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)