nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering versus Transit
From: Barney Wolff <barney () databus com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 11:01 EDT
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 09:01:14 +0100 From: "Alex.Bligh" <amb () xara net>And of course, to be in a position to "dump data" on a router at an exchange, one must have one's own router there peering with *somebody*, right?You needn't peer with anyone ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 w.x.y.z will do the trick nicely if you aren't carrying full routing.
Er, why did the exchange operator let you put a router on their switching fabric if you're not peering there with somebody? Are there actual cases of people with routers at NAPs/MAEs/xIXs who don't peer with anyone? Barney Wolff <barney () databus com> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering versus Transit, (continued)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Doran (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matt Zimmerman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Jeff Young (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matthew Kaufman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Doran (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Barney Wolff (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Barney Wolff (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit William Allen Simpson (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Michael Dillon (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit maillists (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alex.Bligh (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matt Zimmerman (Sep 30)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 29)