nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX )
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:49:42 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Pritish Shah wrote:So here is my question -- why is this kind of arrangement not being used anywhere???Because direction of traffic flow is meaningless as an indicator of direction of value flow, if you will. I send 5MB across Sprint's network. Am I responsible for paying for that traffic, or is Sprint? Think carefully before you answer, or better yet, check what the NANOG archives have to say on the topic. Todd Graham Lewis Linux! Core Engineering
You can make an argument either way. "I'm only sending you that 5mb/sec of data because your educational, ISP, and business customers are asking me for it with Netscape [or whatever]." "I'm only receiving that 5mb/sec of data because your corporate and ISP customers have web servers - and they pay you to make their data available to the world." Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX, (continued)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Enke Chen (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Laughlin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Paul Ferguson (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX maillists (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Chris A. Icide (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Mark Borchers (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Pritish Shah (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Todd Graham Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) alex (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Michael Dillon (Oct 30)