nanog mailing list archives

Re: AGIS/DIGEX


From: Robert Laughlin <robert () portal dx net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:29:16 -0500 (EST)

The CIX router is an very important member benefit and the members have 
consistantly voted to keep it, even though the board has tried to phase 
it out a couple of times.

Best Regards,
Robert Laughlin

(who is running for the empty CIX board position, btw)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DataXchange                sales:  800-863-1550            http://www.dx.net
       Network Operations Center:  703-903-7412 -or- 888-903-7412
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Enke Chen wrote:

Paul, 
I have been thinking about a couple of issues regarding the 
CIX Inter-exchange, and your comments would be appreciated:

(1) CIX is an association of ISPs. The CIX Inter-exchange puts 
    CIX in direct competition with its members (ISPs) for 
    customers.  Is there a contradiction here?   

(2) The CIX Inter-exchange has been used by some to bypass 
    peering policies. I am wondering if the CIX Inter-exchange
    remains a viable option in the peering policy review.

(3) Today there are quite a few inter-exchanges in the Bay Area
    that are superior (in terms of tech. and richness in connectivity)
    than the CIX Interexchange.  Is it fair to say that the 
    CIX Inter-exchange has fulfilled its historical mission and 
    is no longer needed? 

-- Enke

Date:    Tue, 29 Oct 1996 19:31:13 -0800
From:    Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
To:      nanog () merit edu

[...]  Since Digex is at too few NAPs to peer with AGIS, and they
are not at the CIX, we see no routes from them. 

CIX is taking new connections, either T1, PB-SMDS, or DEC-PAIX (FDDI or Ether
).

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: