nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:50:42 -0500 (EST)
Apparently people are still missing the point. On a shared media exchange, there is nothing to preclude another entity from pointing default to you even if they are *not* peering with you [a.k.a. bit-dumping]. - paul
Sure there is. Write a perl script to monitor such things. It takes about 30 minutes - plus another 30 minutes if you want to spiff it up and document it. This assumes you've used a perl-expect type thing before. Avi - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Paul Ferguson (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Deepak Jain (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Jon Zeeff (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]yy Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Jerry Scharf (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Deepak Jain (Oct 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)