nanog mailing list archives
Re: AGIS/DIGEX
From: Tony Li <tli () jnx com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 10:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Others have said this, but it really does seem like there needs to be pricing that allows for varying degrees of peering. It's a big jump from "you pay for every byte" to "you pay us nothing". There are providers who should fall between these extremes. Rest assured that in the fullness of time, such providers will exist. The market will force it. In the mean time, smaller providers who would like to encourage such practices have a rather persuasive inducement towards such a behavior: on your peering application, attach a check. Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX, (continued)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Cathy Wittbrodt (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Bowman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Cathy Wittbrodt (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Bowman (Oct 29)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Laughlin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Jon Zeeff (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Ed Morin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Tony Li (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Neil J. McRae (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Enke Chen (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Robert Laughlin (Oct 30)
- Re: AGIS/DIGEX Avi Freedman (Oct 29)