nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ping flooding
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 22:57:11 -0400
At 08:53 PM 7/11/96 -0500, Alan Hannan wrote:
Vadim, ] 2) Don't Do Any Dynamic Routing Where Only One Path Exists. Certainly I would not agree with this rule. If I have a tail router that is down, I do not want to send traffic to him, when he is not there to receive it. Rather, I would want my intermediate router to reject it right off. Furthermore, I do not want to extend nondynamic notification in my network.
Alan, 'Tis better to black-hole packets than to flap. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ping flooding, (continued)
- Re: Ping flooding Rob Gutierrez (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding Perry E. Metzger (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding Jerry Anderson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Brett D. Watson (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 11)
- Routing flaps, was Re: Ping flooding Forrest W. Christian (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Bradley J. Passwaters (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Rob Gutierrez (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding Paul Ferguson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Jerry Anderson (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Vern Paxson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Jeffrey Burgan (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vern Paxson (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 12)