nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ping flooding
From: Jeffrey Burgan <jburgan () BayNetworks com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 08:59:05 -0400
Vern,
(ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/routing.SIGCOMM.ps.Z). I really wanted to come up with some reason why asymmetric routing has serious implications for TCP performance, but wasn't able to. I guess this is a good thing,
Maybe in a perfect world, but given that all ISPs are not created equal, it is usually the case that the two paths don't have the same latency and packet loss characteristics. Jeff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ping flooding, (continued)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 11)
- Routing flaps, was Re: Ping flooding Forrest W. Christian (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Bradley J. Passwaters (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Paul Ferguson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Jerry Anderson (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Vern Paxson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Jeffrey Burgan (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vern Paxson (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 12)