nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ping flooding
From: "Brett D. Watson" <bwatson () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 18:16:35 -0700
From: Jerry Anderson <jerry () gi net> Subject: Re: Ping flooding Return-Path: <nanog-owner () merit edu> In-Reply-To: <9607092210.AA19147 () butler ncube com> from "Vadim Antonov" at Jul ***9, 96 03:10:38 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu Precedence: bulkThat's once again a matter of defaults -- routers should _by default_ discard all packets from interfaces which they won't use for forwarding those packets back.Why?
then you'll never have an asymetric route. how handy. -brett - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ping flooding George Herbert (Jul 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ping flooding Rob Gutierrez (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding Perry E. Metzger (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 09)
- Re: Ping flooding Jerry Anderson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Brett D. Watson (Jul 10)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 11)
- Routing flaps, was Re: Ping flooding Forrest W. Christian (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Bradley J. Passwaters (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Paul Ferguson (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Alan Hannan (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Jerry Anderson (Jul 12)
- Re: Ping flooding Vadim Antonov (Jul 11)
- Re: Ping flooding Vern Paxson (Jul 11)