nanog mailing list archives
Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up
From: Robert Elz <kre () munnari OZ AU>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:12:14 +1100
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:02:46 -0500 From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com> Message-ID: <199601301302.FAA06195 () lint cisco com> [cc: trimmed to nanog] Which I'm not on... (not that that matters here, this is about ended). Let's just agree that without strong end-to-end encryption, its all swiss cheese. :-) Yes, though with the caveat that without static addresses the cheese is rather rank, and suitable for nothing at all, with static addresses (relaly stable known addresses) so filtering is possible at least a little first level protection is possible. kre
Current thread:
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up, (continued)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Lixia Zhang (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Matt Crawford (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Sanjay Dani (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Paul Ferguson (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Robert Elz (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Paul Ferguson (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Matthew Kaufman (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Robert A. Rosenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Paul Ferguson (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Robert Elz (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up marthag (Jan 30)