nanog mailing list archives
Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:02:46 -0500
[cc: trimmed to nanog] At 07:50 PM 1/30/96 +1100, Robert Elz wrote:
I also know that there are attacks that can be made without requiring return packets at all - those I have to deal with in other ways (smart card password schemes most certainly aren't it) regardless of what kind of address (statically assigned, or dynamically assigned) my brother gets.
Yes, I understand completely. Actually, we could go back and forth like this forever, punching holes in secure access control methods. Let's just agree that without strong end-to-end encryption, its all swiss cheese. :-) - paul
Current thread:
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up, (continued)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Piet Beertema (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up bmanning (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Piet Beertema (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Lixia Zhang (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Matt Crawford (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Sanjay Dani (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Paul Ferguson (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Robert Elz (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Paul Ferguson (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Matthew Kaufman (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Robert A. Rosenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Paul Ferguson (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up Robert Elz (Jan 30)
- Re: Static IP addresses for Dial-up marthag (Jan 30)