nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers

From: Peter Lothberg <roll () stupi se>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 96 17:40:47 MET DST

(2) Could anyone share opinions/facts regarding why organizations may or 
may not exchange routes via the Route Servers rather than direct peering 
relationships at the NAPs?


      I know of no case where an organization "may not" exchange routes
      with the Route Servers.


I do, AS1800..


--Peter

Current thread:

Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers, (continued)
- - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Enke Chen (Apr 30)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Randy Bush (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Elise Gerich (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Paul A Vixie (Apr 30)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Elise Gerich (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Paul Ferguson (Apr 29)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Curtis Villamizar (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Steve Heimlich (Apr 29)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Vadim Antonov (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Peter Lothberg (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers bmanning (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Tim Salo (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Randy Bush (Apr 30)
    - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Matt Zimmerman (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Paul Ferguson (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Rob Gutierrez (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Curtis Villamizar (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers John Curran (Apr 30)
  - Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Matt Zimmerman (Apr 30)
- Re: Peering Policies and Route Servers Justin W. Newton (Apr 30)

(Thread continues...)