nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: hwb () upeksa sdsc edu (Hans-Werner Braun)
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 95 8:26:39 PST
Well, I see two problems, one is that whatever solution be found needs community consensus. Otherwise we may end up with ten anti-NICs or so? Or at least many unhappy customers? The other problem is that (at least I, but may be I am missing something) don't see how at the global systems level this resolves the issue of appropriating address space to, say, a j-random, perhaps new and ignorant with uncertain future, service provider who would like to have 10,000 customers a year from now, and wants 10,000 Class-C numbers accordingly. I still don't understand what the groundrules for address allocation would be, at least at the level below your top-level allocations. Even if you push the problem a level down, it would still have to be resolved. The resource will be scarce somewhere. I am trying to focus on the IP address allocation guidelines here, not the speediness of registrations, with the latter being more of a technical (though apparently painful) issue, and probably a matter of having enough resources allocated.
Current thread:
- Re: Internic address allocation policy, (continued)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Michael S. Ramsey (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Jonathan Heiliger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Paul A Vixie (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Alan Hannan (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Ed Morin (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Alan Hannan (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Paul Traina (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)