nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: ATM_Feel_the_Power <joe () net99 net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 21:23:31 -0700 (MST)
You know the more I read on this the nutter it sounds. We only get address numbers to use them ? I sure as heck don't see having a Class A, B, C or anything like that as a status symbol. Ip numbers are like a Craftsman wrench, a means to and end. How many others are having this same problem ? Joseph
Current thread:
- Internic address allocation policy Paul Lustgraaf (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Michael S. Ramsey (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Jonathan Heiliger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Daniel Karrenberg (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Hans-Werner Braun (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 19)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 17)