nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: bmanning () ISI EDU (Bill Manning)
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 1995 19:31:22 -0800 (PST)
If you fail to agree, you don't get a number. Throughout the FCC letters there is a constant mention of "this scarce DNIC resource may necessitate reassignment of codes not implemented within a six-month period. Now if the FCC has been doing this I am sure we could work out something with the Nic. Joseph Stroup
Of course folks in China recognise the authority of the FCC in this matter. :) Or even the Internic... -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Internic address allocation policy, (continued)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Alan B. Clegg (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Gordon Cook (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Doug Humphrey (Mar 23)
- Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Sean Shapira (Mar 20)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Bill Manning (Mar 20)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Mike Nittmann (Mar 27)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Paul Traina (Mar 27)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Jeremy Porter (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)