nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internic address allocation policy
From: johnr () geo net (John A. Russo - Geonet Communications)
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:35:24 -0800
From: Alan Hannan <alan () mid net> Subject: Re: Internic address allocation policy I know of several companies that would be willing to spend over $10,000 for a class B network. Money is not the issue. Your idea of a (more efficient) distribution center makes sense, however, this should be achieved through group concensus and appointed councils, not by who wants to make money. If T.J. Rogers was dead, he'd be spinning in his grave right now. If you want something done efficiently, you want it run by people who are damn well hungry for money, not by appointed councils.
I couldn't agree with you more Paul.
Current thread:
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks, (continued)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Mike Nittmann (Mar 27)
- Re: Efficient (Dense) Use of Address Blocks Paul Traina (Mar 27)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Jeremy Porter (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy ATM_Feel_the_Power (Mar 18)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Karl Denninger (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy Bill Manning (Mar 20)
- Re: Internic address allocation policy George Herbert (Mar 20)