nanog mailing list archives
Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 08:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
(legal verbage removed so I can think)Humm, maybe that is the reason lawyers never could think :^).How do we deal with a desire to have a "dummy" domain name that can be used in documentation?Have no problem with reserving the name in the IANA's honor. Edu.com, the perennial favorite, is one of these domains. However, I would not advocate that name. Perhaps example.com or reserved.com?
It really does not matter, as long as at least one is made available. -- --bill
Current thread:
- NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Che-Hoo Cheng (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES jeff (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Mark Kosters (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES bmanning (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Mark Kosters (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES bmanning (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES bmanning (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Tim Salo (Jul 28)
- NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Roy Engehausen (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES David J. Schmidt (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Dave McGuire (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES David J. Schmidt (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Stan Barber (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Daniel M. Barton (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Scott Bradner (Jul 28)
- Re: NEW POLICY ON INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES Bill Woodcock (Jul 28)