nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
From: Nikos Mouat <nikm () ixa com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 08:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 28 Jul 1995, Geert Jan de Groot wrote:
As far as I know, there is no 'congestion' on the 800-namespace. maybe, one of the reasons is that these 'records' have a fixed, 7-digit length, and 'vanity' numbers have the same length as ugly ones, spreading the load.
actually, I think there is. that is why they are opening up the '888' area code to be toll free also.
Current thread:
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations, (continued)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations George Herbert (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Gordon Cook (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Nicolas Williams (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Geert Jan de Groot (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Henry Clark (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Nikos Mouat (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Kevin Oberman (Jul 28)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Interpath Hostmaster (Jul 31)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 31)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Michael Dillon (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Bill Manning (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Kevin Oberman (Jul 27)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Mike Lawrie (Jul 27)