nanog mailing list archives
20402 routing entries
From: Tony Li <tli () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1994 15:42:00 -0700
We want to see CIDR used for good. Not for secret or not-so-secret agendas which we do not agree with. We want both hierachial and non-hierachial routing to proceed in parallel. I believe that we have unanimous consent on these items. So, I'll play Suzanne Vega and ask "what's the matter here"? Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: 20402 routing entries, (continued)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Hans-Werner Braun (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Peter S. Ford (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Peter S. Ford (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Peter S. Ford (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 18)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Dennis Ferguson (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- 20402 routing entries Tony Li (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Daniel Karrenberg (Apr 16)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Bob Hinden (Apr 17)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Jessica Yu (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Pushpendra Mohta (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Steven J. Richardson (Apr 15)