Metasploit mailing list archives
Metasploit on Windows
From: arahzone-msf at yahoo.com (arahzone-msf at yahoo.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:33:58 -0800 (PST)
Hi, Just my two cents: don't let down the Cygwin branch. The current Cygwin installer(MSF3) is really great. Do you have any problem with it? Do you think that solving the readline problem of Ruby on Windows would give you the possibility to run msf3 natively on Windows? The Ruby interpreter on Windows is really fishy. I don't know these guys but they definitely don't know how to test software . As Ruby is gaining popularity, these kind of problems would be solved in the near future. Thanks for your great woks. H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote: Hi everyone, We have been struggling to properly support Windows since the early days of 2.0. Cygwin has done a decent job so far, but software incompatibilities and Cygwin version mismatches have caused a ton of problems for some of our users. The Cygwin installer requires a ton of disk space and is a huge drain our bandwidth (+100Gb/mo). With Metasploit 3, we wanted to provide a native Windows version of the Framework. There has been little progress on this front, due to the main user interface (msfconsole) depending on libreadline and libreadline being a broken mess on Windows. In the last year, there have been a number of free virtualization environments available to the public. VMWare has released VMWare Player and VMWare Server, Microsoft is giving away copies of VirtualPC, Xen is becoming more popular, and VirtualBox has released their source as GPL. Both Intel and AMD have virtualization features built into their latest processors and the new version of Windows Server will support native virtualization. On the distribution side, BackTrack (from remote-exploit.org) is really kicking ass and provides a ready-to-run environment for both version of the Framework. So, given the stability issues with the Metasploit Cygwin release, and the wide availability of free virtualization software and OS images, would anyone mind if we drop support for the pre-packed Windows installer of the Metasploit Framework? If we go this route, we will still support Metasploit running on top of Cygwin, but we will not support Cygwin itself or offer a pre-packaged Cygwin environment. We may offer custom live CDs or virtual machine images for download, but these would not be immediately available. Our current documentation (hah!) for using the Windows version will become a list of methods for loading up Metasploit in a virtualized environment. If you think this is a horrible idea, keep in mind that the technically adept can still install Metasploit into their own Cygwin environment, and that the less adept will be able to download ready-to-run virtual machine images sometime in the future. Please reply with your opinion on this (good or bad), we realize quite a few people depend on the Windows installer. Thanks! -HD PS. Yes, we still plan on releasing 3.0 "soon" :-) With any luck we can have the final release completed in February. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20070118/a3780fde/attachment.htm>
Current thread:
- Metasploit on Windows, (continued)
- Metasploit on Windows one.miguel at gmail.com (Jan 17)
- Metasploit on Windows Talha (Jan 17)
- Metasploit on Windows Abhijeet Hatekar (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows Jerome Athias (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows Paul Asadoorian (Jan 18)
- Re: Metasploit on Windows saudibells (Jan 18)
- Re: Metasploit on Windows Rory Garton Smith (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows Simen Bjelke (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows news-letters (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows myx at amex.ro (Jan 19)
- Metasploit on Windows bambam (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows Tim (Jan 18)
- Metasploit on Windows Angelic Solutions (Jan 18)