Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: Porting to MSF 3.x
From: hdm at metasploit.com (H D Moore)
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:39:25 -0500
On Thursday 29 June 2006 13:45, Rhys Kidd wrote:
Point of this, is that for the remaining exploits, more minds looking at these could be helpful. It's not too hard to simply port them to Ruby, ( beyond time ) however quite a few of the exploits could do with a significant overhaul. This includes checking the references actually match the code :P
Agreed.
However, if the MSF devs are interested in including some sort of check-in/check-out system with the SVN access, it could speed up the process of getting _something_ out there for each vulnerability.
We are somewhat paranoid about check-ins, but we can open up the SVN tree read-only starting next week and would be happy to proxy commits that are mailed in as unified diffs. All of the Black Hat materials are due at 6:00pm today, so my free time is at an all time low. -HD
Current thread:
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 Rhys Kidd (Jun 29)
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 Simple Nomad (Jun 29)
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 Chris Byrd (Jun 29)
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 H D Moore (Jun 29)
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 H D Moore (Jun 29)
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 Nicob (Jun 29)
- Payload Handler issues in MSF 3.0-r3 H D Moore (Jun 29)
- Re: Porting to MSF 3.x Rhys Kidd (Jun 29)
- Re: Porting to MSF 3.x H D Moore (Jun 30)