Information Security News mailing list archives
RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh!
From: InfoSec News <isn () c4i org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 01:58:01 -0600 (CST)
Forwarded from: matthew patton <pattonme () yahoo com>
I can only assume the entire Navy is like this. Maybe they should make security school a requirement before they send these guys to run a network.
I would second this but having been thru what the USAF purports to call CompSci training hosted at Biloxi, MS we are evermore doomed to failure. It is from this pool of 'talent' that the USAF relies upon to staff Lan shop officers. Purhaps the enlisted folk have better training and can be relied upon to have some measure of clue but I doubt it. Instead of spending tons of money on debatable security measures I wish the feds would instead put every last sysadmin thru a technical boot camp. And pound into their thick brains the absolutely minimally acceptable security/administrative procedures. That and send the admins to SANS conferences where they just might realize the world is a dangerous place and that just because you're gov't or military doesn't mean your network is invulnerable. Whenever I meet a sysadmin (contractor or uniformed) that works for the gov't I always assume they are incompetent until they prove otherwise. And regrettibly the incompetents far outnumber the clueful. - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomo () attrition org with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
Current thread:
- Re: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 01)
- Re: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 04)
- RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 05)
- RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 06)
- RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 07)
- RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 08)
- RE: [TSCM-L] Security? Huh! InfoSec News (Mar 09)