Information Security News mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'?
From: The Dodger <dodger () 2600 COM>
Date: Wed, 12 May 0100 07:20:06 -0400
Craig Williams wrote:I think this is a lame attempt to pass blame. [...] Are we supposed to now disable the running of exe files, I think not ;)
JJ Gray wrote:
How long will it take for people to think for a second before blindly double-clicking on an attachment?
I was under the impression that Outlook 2000 automatically ran the ILOVEYOU VBScript attachment when it previewed the mail (i.e. as it does automatically in the preview pane). In other words, the user didn't have to open the attachment. Fortunately, I can't be certain of this, because my company hasn't had any problems with ILOVEYOU, so perhaps someone else could confirm/deny this? D. ISN is sponsored by SecurityFocus.com --- To unsubscribe email LISTSERV () SecurityFocus com with a message body of "SIGNOFF ISN".
Current thread:
- Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? William Knowles (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? William Knowles (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Felix von Leitner (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Aj Effin ReznoR (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? The Dodger (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Barry H Gill (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Bronc Buster (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Erik Moeller (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Barry H Gill (May 12)
- Re: Microsoft to Blame for 'Love Bug'? Chico (May 12)