Interesting People mailing list archives

Re World War Three, by Mistake


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:57:00 -0500




Begin forwarded message:

From: John Day <jeanjour () comcast net>
Date: December 26, 2016 at 2:16:42 PM EST
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] World War Three, by Mistake

If you remember, the 1960s novel “Fail-Safe” is based on a B-52 on station being given the “go” because of a chip 
going bad at the wrong time.

When I saw the subject line, I thought this was going to be about the recent Israel/Pakistan “interaction.”

But it is right, the recent harsh words being bantered about are increasing the probability.

John


On Dec 26, 2016, at 12:59, Dave Farber <farber () gmail com> wrote:




Begin forwarded message:

From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>
Date: December 24, 2016 at 11:28:16 AM EST
To: Multiple recipients of Dewayne-Net <dewayne-net () warpspeed com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] World War Three, by Mistake
Reply-To: dewayne-net () warpspeed com

World War Three, by Mistake
Harsh political rhetoric, combined with the vulnerability of the nuclear command-and-control system, has made the 
risk of global catastrophe greater than ever.
By Eric Schlosser
Dec 23 2016
<http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/world-war-three-by-mistake>

On June 3, 1980, at about two-thirty in the morning, computers at the National Military Command Center, beneath the 
Pentagon, at the headquarters of the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD), deep within Cheyenne Mountain, 
Colorado, and at Site R, the Pentagon’s alternate command post center hidden inside Raven Rock Mountain, 
Pennsylvania, issued an urgent warning: the Soviet Union had just launched a nuclear attack on the United States. 
The Soviets had recently invaded Afghanistan, and the animosity between the two superpowers was greater than at any 
other time since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

U.S. Air Force ballistic-missile crews removed their launch keys from the safes, bomber crews ran to their planes, 
fighter planes took off to search the skies, and the Federal Aviation Administration prepared to order every 
airborne commercial airliner to land.

President Jimmy Carter’s national-security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, was asleep in Washington, D.C., when the 
phone rang. His military aide, General William Odom, was calling to inform him that two hundred and twenty missiles 
launched from Soviet submarines were heading toward the United States. Brzezinski told Odom to get confirmation of 
the attack. A retaliatory strike would have to be ordered quickly; Washington might be destroyed within minutes. 
Odom called back and offered a correction: twenty-two hundred Soviet missiles had been launched.

Brzezinski decided not to wake up his wife, preferring that she die in her sleep. As he prepared to call Carter and 
recommend an American counterattack, the phone rang for a third time. Odom apologized—it was a false alarm. An 
investigation later found that a defective computer chip in a communications device at NORAD headquarters had 
generated the erroneous warning. The chip cost forty-six cents.

A similar false alarm had occurred the previous year, when someone mistakenly inserted a training tape, featuring a 
highly realistic simulation of an all-out Soviet attack, into one of NORAD’s computers. During the Cold War, false 
alarms were also triggered by the moon rising over Norway, the launch of a weather rocket from Norway, a solar 
storm, sunlight reflecting off high-altitude clouds, and a faulty A.T. & T. telephone switch in Black Forest, 
Colorado.

My book “Command and Control” explores how the systems devised to govern the use of nuclear weapons, like all 
complex technological systems, are inherently flawed. They are designed, built, installed, maintained, and operated 
by human beings. But the failure of a nuclear command-and-control system can have consequences far more serious 
than the crash of an online dating site from too much traffic or flight delays caused by a software glitch. 
Millions of people, perhaps hundreds of millions, could be annihilated inadvertently. “Command and Control” 
focusses on near-catastrophic errors and accidents in the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union 
that ended in 1991. The danger never went away. Today, the odds of a nuclear war being started by mistake are 
low—and yet the risk is growing, as the United States and Russia drift toward a new cold war. The other day, 
Senator John McCain called Vladimir Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, “a thug, a bully, and a 
murderer,” adding that anyone who “describes him as anything else is lying.” Other members of Congress have 
attacked Putin for trying to influence the Presidential election.  On Thursday, Putin warned that Russia would 
“strengthen the military potential of strategic nuclear forces,” and President-elect Donald Trump has responded 
with a vow to expand America’s nuclear arsenal.  “Let it be an arms race,” Trump told one of the co-hosts of 
MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “We will outmatch them at every pass and outlast them all.”

The harsh rhetoric on both sides increases the danger of miscalculations and mistakes, as do other factors. Close 
encounters between the military aircraft of the United States and Russia have become routine, creating the 
potential for an unintended conflict. Many of the nuclear-weapon systems on both sides are aging and obsolete. The 
personnel who operate those systems often suffer from poor morale and poor training. None of their senior officers 
has firsthand experience making decisions during an actual nuclear crisis. And today’s command-and-control systems 
must contend with threats that barely existed during the Cold War: malware, spyware, worms, bugs, viruses, 
corrupted firmware, logic bombs, Trojan horses, and all the other modern tools of cyber warfare. The greatest 
danger is posed not by any technological innovation but by a dilemma that has haunted nuclear strategy since the 
first detonation of an atomic bomb: How do you prevent a nuclear attack while preserving the ability to launch one?

“The pattern of the use of atomic weapons was set at Hiroshima,” J. Robert Oppenheimer, the scientific director of 
the Manhattan Project, said in November, 1945, just a few months after the Japanese city’s destruction. “They are 
weapons of aggression, of surprise, and of terror.” Nuclear weapons made annihilation vastly more efficient. A 
single bomb could now destroy a target whose elimination had once required thousands of bombs. During an aerial 
attack, you could shoot down ninety-nine per cent of the enemy’s bombers—and the plane that you missed could 
obliterate an entire city. A war between two countries with nuclear weapons, like a Wild West shoot-out, might be 
won by whoever fired first. And a surprise attack might provide the only hope of national survival—especially for 
the country with an inferior nuclear arsenal.

[snip]

Dewayne-Net RSS Feed: <http://dewaynenet.wordpress.com/feed/>



Archives  | Modify  Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now       




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20161226155708:DB145AFE-CBAD-11E6-B9E0-A32E33CB6262
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: