Interesting People mailing list archives

Re Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.


From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:21:18 -0500




Begin forwarded message:

From: Andrew Bridges <apbridges () gmail com>
Date: December 13, 2016 at 8:50:46 PM EST
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.

Also for IP, if you wish.

As Art points out, the monopoly (really oligopoly) question is separate from the digital copyright issue.

As to the former, we have previously heard about other dominant groupings:  AOL+Prodigy+Compuserve; IBM+DEC+HP; 
Microsoft+Novell+WordPerfect+Lotus; MySpace+Friendster.  Now more than ever new technologies and business models 
compete with old ones, and competition among models may matter more than competition within one model.  Standalone 
applications were a big deal and then suites changed the landscape.  MS owned the desktop; Google owned the 
searchable Web; apps and cloud services are now at the fore.  Successful companies migrate well from one model to 
another, but fresh challenges and challengers are likely to arise, and today's GAFA may look very different in a few 
years.

On the question of digital copyright, the Techdirt report The Sky Is Rising and its sequel provide a useful different 
perspective.  See https://www.techdirt.com/skyisrising/  There are now many opportunities for entertainment spending 
that compete forcefully against recorded music, and the drop in recorded music revenues has many explanations, 
including freedom from the necessity of buying music in 12-packs when one wants only 1 or 2 songs from the 12-pack.  
Andrew Bridges


On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Dave Farber <farber () gmail com> wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: Art Brodsky <artbrodsky () yahoo com>
Date: December 13, 2016 at 6:35:14 PM EST
To: "dave () farber net" <dave () farber net>, ip <ip () listbox com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Re Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.
Reply-To: Art Brodsky <artbrodsky () yahoo com>

A comment for IP, if you wish.

Taplin's piece is about protecting music from alleged digital copyright, not a serious discussion of monopolies or 
the Internet or telecom.  His reference to the "fading telecommunications business" shows he doesn't really care 
about Internet carrier monopolies or consumer choice.  Absent the copyright issue, Taplin and others from the 
"creative community" would not care a whit about Facebook and Google.
 
Art Brodsky
Communications Consultant
301-908-7715
@artbrodsky


From: Dave Farber <farber () gmail com>
To: ip <ip () listbox com> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:27 PM
Subject: [IP] Re Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.




Begin forwarded message:

From: Christopher Mitchell <christopher () newrules org>
Date: December 13, 2016 at 5:09:27 PM EST
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Subject: Re: [IP] Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.
Reply-To: christopher () newrules org

I'm glad that 100 years ago, people demanded the big monopolies be broken up rather than be suckered into an 
argument about whether Standard Oil was worse than the Railroads. The question is not which monopoly is the worst, 
it is what to do about massive firms that prevent markets from working well. 

Historically, the solution has come from sensible people within existing parties working together to support 
policy that prevented this consolidation. The longer we wait to deal with it, the harder it will be ... especially 
as they eclipse the power of government. 

Christopher Mitchell
Director, Community Broadband Networks
Institute for Local Self-Reliance

https://www.muninetworks.org
@communitynets
612-276-3456 x209

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:54 PM, David Farber <farber () gmail com> wrote:


Begin forwarded message:

From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.
Date: December 13, 2016 at 8:28:49 AM EST
To: Multiple recipients of Dewayne-Net <dewayne-net () warpspeed com>
Reply-To: dewayne-net () warpspeed com

Forget AT&T. The Real Monopolies Are Google and Facebook.
By JONATHAN TAPLIN
Dec 13 2016
<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/ 12/13/opinion/forget-att-the- real-monopolies-are-google- and-facebook.html>

The proposed merger of AT&T and Time Warner has drawn censure from both sides of the political aisle, as well as a 
Senate hearing that looked into the potential for the combined company to become a monopoly.

But if we are going to examine media monopolies, we should look first at Silicon Valley, not the fading phone 
business.

Mark Cuban, the internet entrepreneur, said at the meeting of the Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee last 
week that the truly dominant companies in media distribution these days were Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon.

“Facebook is without question in a dominant position, if not the dominant position, for content delivery,” he said.

Look at the numbers. Alphabet (the parent company of Google) and Facebook are among the 10 largest companies in 
the world. Alphabet alone has a market capitalization of around $550 billion. AT&T and Time Warner combined would 
be about $300 billion.

Alphabet has an 83 percent share of the mobile search market in the United States and just under 63 percent of the 
US mobile phone operating systems market. AT&T has a 32 percent market share in mobile phones and 26 percent in 
pay TV. The combined AT&T-Time Warner will have $8 billion in cash but $171 billion of net debt, according to the 
research company MoffettNathanson. Compare that to Alphabet’s balance sheet, with total cash of $76 billion and 
total debt of about $3.94 billion.

In the first quarter of 2016, 85 cents of every new dollar spent in online advertising will go to Google or 
Facebook, according to Brian Nowak, an analyst with Morgan Stanley.

Google and Facebook can achieve huge net profit margins because they dominate the content made available on the 
web while making very little of it themselves. Instead, they both have built their advertising businesses as “free 
riders” on content made by others, some of it from Time Warner. The rise of these digital giants is directly 
connected to the fall of the creative industries of our country.

Every pirated music video or song posted on YouTube or Facebook robs the creators of income, and YouTube in 
particular is dominated by unlicensed content. Google’s YouTube has an over 55 percent market share in the 
streaming audio business and yet provides less than 11 percent of the streaming audio revenues to the content 
owners and creators. But Facebook, which refuses to enter into any licensing agreement on music or video, is 
challenging YouTube in the free online video and music world.

In the past decade, an enormous reallocation of revenue of perhaps $50 billion a year has taken place, with 
economic value moving from creators of content to owners of monopoly platforms.

I reached this conclusion from the following statistics: Since 2000, recorded music revenues in the United States 
have fallen to $7.2 billion per year from $19.8 billion. Home entertainment video revenue fell to $18 billion in 
2014 from $24.2 billion in 2006. United States newspaper ad revenue fell to $23.6 billion in 2013 from $65.8 
billion in 2000.

[snip]

Dewayne-Net RSS Feed: <http://dewaynenet.wordpress. com/feed/>







Archives  | Modify  Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now       




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125
Unsubscribe Now: 
https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20161214192128:686D6518-C25C-11E6-8995-EE5FF57A2A91
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Current thread: