Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:35:33 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Brett Glass <brett () lariat net> Date: March 11, 2010 4:55:39 PM EST To: dave () farber net, "ip" <ip () v2 listbox com> Subject: Re: [IP] Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing These tests will do little or nothing to determine a connection's bandwidth or quality. My network routes different types of traffic through different connections which are optimized for that type of traffic. But the test doesn't "know" this; it tries to access random, uncacheable data through our cache and thus gives results which are not typical of what users will experience. This hurts the outcome. So does the fact that our network does traffic shaping with bursting (a technique which optimizes it for interactive activities while deprioritizing unattended tasks such as long downloads) -- a feature which our users love. In short, the tests are "dumb" tests designed for "dumb" networks. My network uses innovative, "smart" techniques which optimize the bang per buck for real life users but not for these artificial and unrealistic benchmarks. The tests also, for some reason I cannot determine, report wildly varying numbers for jitter. And they access only certain destinations on the Net, including Google and "speedtest.net", thus biasing the results in favor of ISPs who happen to be close, network-wise, to those sites. And they don't make sure that the user's connection is not congested by other traffic, nor that the user's computer doesn't have a high processing load which hurts its responsiveness and hence the speed of the connection. In short, these tests appear designed to give the worst possible appraisal of an ISP's network, and to penalize an ISP for implementing innovative technologies that optimize the use of scarce and expensive backbone bandwidth. --Brett Glass ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing Dave Farber (Mar 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing Dave Farber (Mar 11)
- Re: Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing David Farber (Mar 11)
- Re: Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing David Farber (Mar 11)
- Re: Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing David Farber (Mar 11)
- Re: Why I'm Skeptical of the FCC's Call for User Broadband Testing Dave Farber (Mar 12)