Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:21:35 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Brett Glass <brett () lariat net> Date: September 14, 2009 11:56:54 AM EDT To: dave () farber net, "ip" <ip () v2 listbox com>Subject: Re: [IP] Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME
At 01:50 PM 9/13/2009, David Farber wrote:
Summing up, Keshav found that a text message doesn't cost providers more than 0.3 cent."
This isn't accurate. The cost of building out, operating, and maintaining the cellular network is tremendous (and is inflated by problems such as overcharges by the ILECs for leased lines to connect the towers -- also known as "special access"). What's more, due to the advent of cut rate and unlimited calling plans (in which the carriers actually lose money on some voice customers), this cost can't be supported by voice service alone.
Without SMS charges, all of the major cellular carriers would lose money unless they substantially raised rates for other services.
--Brett Glass ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME David Farber (Sep 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME David Farber (Sep 13)
- Re: Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME David Farber (Sep 13)
- Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME Dave Farber (Sep 14)
- Re: Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME David Farber (Sep 15)
- Re: Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME David Farber (Sep 15)
- Cell-Phone Bills: Is Text-Messaging Too Expensive? - TIME Dave Farber (Sep 16)