Interesting People mailing list archives

FCC faces steep challenge in developing national broadband policy


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:48:09 -0400



Begin forwarded message:

From: dewayne () warpspeed com (Dewayne Hendricks)
Date: July 10, 2009 3:02:25 PM EDT
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <xyzzy () warpspeed com>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] FCC faces steep challenge in developing national broadband policy

FCC faces steep challenge in developing national broadband policy
Input from stakeholders features discord, widely differing opinions

By Doug Adams, Knight Center of Digital Excellence

<http://www.benton.org/node/26386>

It's well chronicled how the past nine years have seen the U.S. move from a leader in broadband service to being ranked somewhere in the high teens among all nations (depending on the survey). With slower, more expensive service, our nation is not in the position it should be to make sure broadband services are available and able to foster innovation at home. The U.S. is quickly losing out on economic opportunities while its position as a generator of patents slips to nations with robust broadband platforms for innovation in place.

The broadband stimulus package brings with it hope that the U.S. can get back on track to being globally competitive. While at the same time, with $7.2 billion for broadband on the table, opinions vary as to the best way to leverage this investment. While the broadband investment is both significant and welcome, the jury is out on the economic development impact it will have as the first round (and perhaps future rounds) are focused more on rural and underserved than urban centers of innovation and development.

In seeking input towards a national broadband strategy, the FCC drew more than 1,800 responses from a wide range of players including telecoms, cable companies, think tanks, advocacy groups, and individual cities.

It's not surprising there was little common ground on nearly every issue, from whether the government should protect net neutrality, to whether cable companies and telecoms should lease their lines to competitors, to whether the FCC should back local cities and towns that want to build their own broadband networks.

Internet Service Providers

In general, telecoms and cable companies are asking the FCC to take a hands-off approach. While the rankings suggest otherwise, one cable company argued in its 123-page filing that high-speed cable has "succeeded beyond anyone's predictions." The company says that the FCC's "regulatory restraint" induced cable companies to deploy high- speed cable Internet service that's now available to more than 92 percent of households.

It's not a lack of affordable service, claims one telecom organization, that accounts for a lack in broadband penetration - it's because people don't see the value in the service.

"The adoption challenge is four times as large as the access challenge, and deserves commensurate attention," the company argues.

The U.S. Telecom Association likewise argues that, "While much of the public debate on broadband has focused on access issues, a potentially larger challenge facing policy makers is on the demand side: Lack of computers, lack of computer education and perceived lack of Internet relevance at least are major impediments to America becoming a truly broadband nation."

[snip]
RSS Feed: <http://www.warpspeed.com/wordpress>




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


Current thread: