Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:15:14 -0700
________________________________________ From: Scott Alexander [salex () dsalex org] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 1:14 PM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet Dave: Of the many conversations I've heard over why amateur radio is fading (or equivalently how to get more people involved), content is one argument I haven't heard. The success of the Internet is a common one. After all, for the kid sitting at home in his room who would like to talk to people across the world, the Internet is clearer, easier, and more familiar than HF radio. I've also heard that innovation has become more difficult with the increasing commercialization of the radio business. (Personally, I think there is some interesting work being done in software defined radio in the amateur community. I believe that's because once again a tool has been invented that is powerful, but the uses of which aren't obvious. Also, the component pieces are relatively cheap and relatively easy to work this. This is similar to where radio was during the "golden age" of amateur radio.) In the case of the Internet (or the imagined magical wireless internet), I think the key difference is that people see it as a tool for getting the information they want. I suspect that the provider of such a thing will spend an immense amount of time trying to keep people from doing what they want. (How will the number of bored teenagers who want to see porn compare with the number of staff members trying to prevent that?) With amateur radio, the number of people who found it useful or interesting decreased as alternatives became available. With such a magical internet, I believe the issue will be that they will constrain it until false positives mean that it is no longer a useful tool to those trying to do work within the stated goals. Best, Scott Alexander (AB2WF) On Jun 29, 2008, at 12:36 PM, David Farber wrote:
________________________________________ From: Randy Fischer [randy.fischer () gmail com] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 12:11 PM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet Dave, It seems to me this kind of censorship has been tried already, and it's called Amateur Radio. While there was plenty of innovation there, the requirements on what could be broadcast where strict enough to have marginalized it. - Randy Fischer
------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 25)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 25)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 29)
- FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 29)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 29)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 29)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 29)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 29)
- Re: FCC wants a magic, porn-free wireless Internet David Farber (Jun 30)