New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life?

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

It is my experience that battery life is much worse in practice. I have a 1st gen iPhone with 2.0 software. 
Periodically the phone gets hot as hell. Why, no ideabut the battery goes down fast. Might be the "push" mail but 
sometimes it is good sometimes bad . mail always runs?


By the way I am still deeply disturbed by the lack of understanding of Apple that many of their customers do not enjoy 
standing in line in the heat just because Apple can not seem to understand scheduling . Weird. Dave Crocker might have 
it right.

Dave


________________________________________
From: Lauren Weinstein [lauren () vortex com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:26 PM
To: David Farber
Cc: lauren () vortex com
Subject: New iPhone applications vs. (permanent) battery life?

Dave,

Given the iPhone's expensive to replace (for non-hackers) "permanent"
battery, I'm interested in reports of rapid battery decline
associated with the rash of new iPhone applications, many of which
involve keeping the display lit, long-period data streaming, etc.

Question: Will the new applications make the non-user-replaceable
battery much less palatable than previously, given that many users
may burn through its available cycle life much more rapidly than
before?

Thanks.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR
   - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, NNSquad
   - Network Neutrality Squad - http://www.nnsquad.org
Founder, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com