Interesting People mailing list archives
more on We all have to sacrifice, in the War on Terriers]]
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:38:22 -0500
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [IP] more on We all have to sacrifice, in the War on Terriers] Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:45:10 -0800 From: Ross Stapleton-Gray <ross () stapleton-gray com> To: dave () farber net, Andrew Koenig <ark () acm org> References: <44077E9F.1000602 () farber net> At 03:24 PM 3/2/2006, Andrew Koenig <ark () acm org> wrote:
Walter called television stations, the American Civil Liberties Union and me. And he went on the Internet to see what he could learn. He learned about changes in something called the Bank Privacy Act.This is something new? Shortly before I got married in 1998, my wife-to-be and I bought wedding rings. I forget why, but we had to pay for each ring in a separate transaction...
But there's a huge difference between credit lenders' anti-fraud processes, and government-compelled reporting/transaction interdiction. Yes, the credit card companies have long applied heuristics to attempt to block fraudulent use (my last tripping of that was in driving the household goods cross country from DC to SF in 2001... gassing up in 3 or more Western states in a day seemed to set Visa off). Presumably one could either shop among providers for the features one liked, or negotiate with the provider for how you'd like to be treated ("I'd like the Spend-Like-a-Sailor NoChecks service, please"); a role for government there would be to establish certain guarantees, e.g., "Upon presentation of sufficient ID [so spelled out], any customer shall not be barred from withdrawing all funds within one business day," or "...borrow to the established credit limit," etc., to prevent abuse in lending/savings ("We said you'd have credit, but we won't really give you credit unless you pay us more..."). When government digs deeper and deeper into every financial transaction (and this also started a long time ago, with FinCen, and the reporting of large cash transactions... IIRC, it was related to drug transactions/money laundering, the War Before the War on Terror), that's another issue entirely. The argument that, "Well, any transaction could be related to Terror, and wherever we set the bar, the Terrorists will learn it and 'smurf' even smaller transactions, so we ought to monitor smaller transactions, so...," is little different from those being thrown around for expansion of wiretaps, etc., and poses far greater risk to the Republic than the actions of "Terrorists," who have far smaller budgets, and little means to hurt us if we don't magnify their power through our own fear. Ross ---- Ross Stapleton-Gray, Ph.D. Stapleton-Gray & Associates, Inc. http://www.stapleton-gray.com http://www.sortingdoor.com ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on We all have to sacrifice, in the War on Terriers]] Dave Farber (Mar 02)