Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:16:27 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Date: January 20, 2006 11:05:17 PM EST To: Seth Finkelstein <sethf () sethf com>Cc: David Farber <dave () farber net>, Dana Blankenhorn <dana@a- clue.com>, Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com>, Jim McCoy <mccoy@mad- scientist.com>
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches Seth, I don't have the time right now to write up my thoughts appropriately to address this in detail, so just a couple of notes for the moment. The particulars of the government demands in this case are obviously somewhat arbitrary since they were subject to significant negotiation -- which suggests that the next time around the demands on search engines are likely to also be significantly arbitrary, but perhaps not subject to as much negotiation. In other words, the government is applying its usual "it's my ball and my game" approach -- even though in this case it's not even a criminal investigation. We of course don't know the extent to which search engines are subjected so data orders related to criminal cases, or for that matter national security letters under PATRIOT. But viewed purely on its own merits, this case has all the look and smell of the camel's nose under the tent. Also, my reading of Gonzales v. Google, Inc. on FindLaw (and the FindLaw commentary) indicate that the government also ordered Google to supply "the text of *each search string* over a one-week period (absent any information identifying the person who entered such query)". [emphasis added] This suggests that the source IP address and perhaps any cookies could be filtered out, but that section doesn't seem to say anything to permit the removal of sensitive or personal information from within the bodies of the query strings themselves. In any case, a full week of search strings is far different from a random sampling by any reasonable definition that I'm familiar with. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren () vortex com or lauren () pfir org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches David Farber (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches David Farber (Jan 20)
- more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches David Farber (Jan 21)
- more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches David Farber (Jan 21)
- more on Subpoena for 1 million random web searches David Farber (Jan 21)