Interesting People mailing list archives
Diebold voting machines in California
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:09:53 -0500
Begin forwarded message: From: Ghball () aol com Date: November 28, 2005 9:39:53 AM EST To: dave () farber net Subject: Fwd: [dtnna] Diebold voting machines in California For IPers in California (and elsewhere) Geoff Ball Geoff Ball, Ph.D. Geoff Ball & Associates "Enabling people to work together in groups" 164 Main Street, Room 210, Los Altos, CA 94022 650-941-1497 (phone); 650-941-1498 (fax) ghball () aol com www.geoffballfacilitator.com and SmartGroupsWork.com From: Dan Lorimer <Lorimer () Meer net> Date: November 27, 2005 10:58:43 PM EST To: dtnna () yahoogroups com Subject: [dtnna] Diebold voting machines in California Reply-To: dtnna-owner () yahoogroups com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/kgOolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Dear Friends, Tomorrow is an essential day to preserve YOUR right to a fair ballot process. Calif's Republican Secretary of State, Bruce McPherson, must hear from us by tomorrow with our concerns about the easily hackable Diebold voting machines. Please read the info below and make a call or send an e-mail MONDAY. If we can stop them in California, people in other states, like Ohio, will gain momentum in their battle to preserve voting rights, too. This is as in important as the civil rights effort was in its day. PLEASE take a minute to act! With appreciation, Dan Lorimer From: "GrassrootsWest.org" <info () grassrootswest org> Date: November 27, 2005 4:47:06 PM PST To: lilienstein () earthlink net GrassrootsWest.org Our Republican Secretary of State Bruce McPherson, has given California citizens through tomorrow (MONDAY, Nov. 28) to submit public comment regarding his proposed certification of Diebold voting machines. If you want to prevent your votes from being counted by secret software, running on unreliable machines owned by a right wing corporation, then take action TODAY. Call, fax, or email to Secretary of State's office before 5 pm Monday and let him know what you think of this attempt to thwart democracy: • Call: (916) 653-6814 (press 6, then 3) (Monday, 8 am - 5 pm) • FAX: 916 653-3214 (anytime till 5 pm Monday) • Email: VotingSystemComment () ss ca gov Background info: Five Reasons NOT to Certify Diebold: 1. Secret software - How can elections be fair and transparent when the public cannot examine the source code for the software that counts the votes? Without this assurance, programmers can put in hidden "backdoors" or simply write shoddy software. Diebold will NOT share its source code. 2. The GEMS Defect - Reported by Bev Harris (of BlackBoxVoting.otg) and Dr. Herbert Thompson, and independently confirmed by the security consultant firm Compuware, the GEMS Defect concerns the central vote tabulating database. By exploiting this defect a citizen team was able to remotely upload, download and execute files with full system administrator privileges. Furthermore, the GEMS software comes with a criminal pedigree. One of its authors, Diebold consultant Jeff Dean, was convicted of planting "backdoors" in his software and using a "high degree of sophistication" to evade detection. 3. Stuffing the Electronic Ballot Box with Diebold Memory Cards - Finnish computer expert Harry Hursti, in cooperation with the elections administration of Leon County, Florida, has demonstrated in real-world voting conditions that executable code on the memory cards integral to the operation of Diebold optical scanners and touchscreens can be quickly manipulated to change vote counts without detection. For a full report visit: www.blackboxvoting.org/BBVreport.pdf 4. Unauditable Absentee Ballots on Diebold Optical Scanners - Diebold's central count scanners are unable to write backup data to memory storage, instead passing all vote counting directly to the notoriously insecure GEMS tabulator. No "poll tapes" or secondary source of data is retained, and there is no way to check whether the GEMS security defect was exploited without obtaining the GEMS vote data files. Diebold refuses to release these files. 5. Diebold Continues to Perjure and Violate Election Laws - Records obtained by Black Box Voting show that Diebold executives lied to the Arizona Secretary of State, the Cuyahoga, Ohio, County Board of Elections, and to hundreds of elections officials throughout the U.S. about the existence of specific defects. Most notoriously of all, Diebold lied to the State of California in 2003 about illegally installing uncertified voting software in all 17 counties where Diebold had contracts. For a full list of reason to NOT certify Diebold machines visit www.califelectprotect.net/7ReasonsNOTtoCertify.pdf November 14, 2005 BRAD FRIEDMAN 11.13.2005 The Staggeringly Impossible Results of Ohio's '05 Election With so much going on, few have noticed the extraordinary outcome of last Tuesday's election in Ohio where the crooked state that brought you -- by hook and by crook -- a second term for George W. Bush...As usual, the Free Press' heroic [journalists] Bob Fitrakis and Harvey
Wasserman are on the case. Their article on what happened on ballot issues 1 through 5 last week is A MUST READ for anybody who still gives the slightest damn about whatever democracy might be left in America. I'll try to summarize here briefly. There were five initiatives on the ballot... Issue 1 was a controversial proposition for $2 billion in new state spending. The Christian Right was opposed (because some of the new funds might go to stem cell research), but otherwise, the Republican Governor Taft's Administration (he recently plead guilty to several counts of corruption) was pushing it hard, alongside progressives in the state. The Columbus Dispatch's pre-election polling, which Fritrakis and Wasserman describe as "uncannily accurate for decades", called the race correctly within 1% of the final result. The margin of error for the poll was +/- 2.5% with a 95% confidence interval. On Issue 1, the Dispatch poll was right on the money. They predicted 53% in favor, the final result was 54% in favor. But then came Issues 2 through 5, put forward by ReformOhioNow.org -- a bi-partisan coalition pushing these four initiatives for Electoral Reform in the Buckeye State largely in response to the shameful '04 Election... On those four issues... the final results were impossibly different -- and we mean impossibly! -- from both the Dispatch's final polling before the election and all reasoned common-sense. Take a look: ISSUE 2 (Allow easier absentee balloting) PRE-POLLING: 59% Yes, 33% No, 9% Undecided FINAL RESULT: 36% Yes, 63% No ISSUE 3 (Revise campaign contribution limits) PRE-POLLING: 61% Yes, 25% No, 14% Undecided FINAL RESULT: 33% Yes, 66% No ISSUE 4 (Independent Commission to draw Congressional Districts) PRE-POLLING: 31% Yes, 45% No, 25% Undecided FINAL RESULT: 30% Yes, 69% No ISSUE 5 (Independent Board instead of Sec. of State to oversee elections) PRE-POLLING: 41% Yes, 43% No, 16% Undecided FINAL RESULT: 29% Yes, 70% No What could possibly explain such unheard of differences between the Dispatch's poll and the final results? {here's a hint: ] This was the year that Ohio, under the encouragement and mandates from the Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, rolled out new Electronic Touch-Screen Voting Machines in 44 of its 88 counties...41 of them employing the same Diebold Touch-Screen Machines that California ... refused to certify when 20% of them failed this summer in the largest test of its kind ever held. These were also the very same Electronic Voting Machines which a recent GAO Report confirmed to be easily hackable. Will the absurdly skewed results from last Tuesday's Ohio Election finally light a fire under the media -- either nationally or just in Ohio alone -- to look into what the hell is going on here?! We remain hopeful...if not optimistic. The Free Press article is a must read, as mentioned, but we'll share their closing thoughts here on the possible reasons for the wildly unexplained discrepancy between the final polling and the final results which, as they posit, are due to either a completely inexplicable breakdown of the Dispatch's historically accurate polling methods wildly beyond the margin-of-error for all initiatives except Issue 1...or...somebody hacked that vote count: If the latter is true, it can and will be done again, and we can forget forever about the state that has been essential to the election of every Republican presidential candidate since Lincoln. And we can also, for all intents and purposes, forget about the future of American democracy. November 14, 2005 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dtnna/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: dtnna-unsubscribe () yahoogroups com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Diebold voting machines in California David Farber (Nov 28)