Interesting People mailing list archives
more on FCC VoIP 911 order
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 06:09:30 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu> Date: May 22, 2005 10:23:26 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: DV Henkel-Wallace <gumby () henkel-wallace org> Cc: Ip ip <ip () v2 listbox com> Subject: Re: [IP] more on FCC VoIP 911 orderIn message <9D67DA33-6765-4FF5-B269-81FFB982B77F () farber net>, David Farber writ
es:
Consider this implementation: the FCC mandates the following: every DHCP client sold must accept a new location identifier. Every commercial VOIP phone or service must get this info and pass it on for E911 use.
I believe that this and similar postings are missing the point behind the FCC's order. For details, see the May 12 Wall Street Journal; it summarizes a litany of procedural problems with 911 service from many VoIP providers. Here are some quotes: Calls from these services sometimes ring at general or administrative numbers at emergency-call centers instead of connecting directly to 911 operators. In some places, those general numbers aren't staffed after normal business hours. Even when the calls are answered, the person on the other end may not be a trained emergency operator and can't see the caller's address automatically. .... Vonage says part of the problem with connecting its service to 911 is that in many areas the regional Bell companies control the systems that connect calls to 911 , and the Bells have been reluctant to grant Vonage access to the system. For their part, the Bells have expressed concerns about keeping the 911 system safe from hackers. Some industry observers say the disputes largely reflect differences over the terms of connecting. ... The letter, from the head of [New York City's] epartment of information technology and telecommunications, said Vonage and several other Internet-based companies are, without permission, sending emergency calls to "a single phone sitting on an administrative desk. The only relationship of this phone to the city's 911 system is that the desk happens to be located in the same building where the city's main 911 call center is also located. This phone isn't equipped to serve an emergency response or public safety function." Vonage spokeswoman Brooke Schultz said the company has asked repeatedly for an alternative but got nowhere until recently. Other complaints are about the web site disclosures and procedures for dealing with 911 service. Yes, there are technical issues involving location. There is indeed a DCHP option for location information (RFC 3825), and it would probably be a good idea if cable ISPs were to use it. But it won't do any good if the back end systems aren't there, and that will take co-operation by VoIP providers and conventional 911 operators. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on FCC VoIP 911 order David Farber (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on FCC VoIP 911 order David Farber (May 23)
- more on FCC VoIP 911 order David Farber (May 23)