Interesting People mailing list archives
more on NYC will arrest for contraband in subway searches
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:19:40 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () hserus net> Date: July 22, 2005 11:59:08 AM EDT To: Lauren Weinstein <lauren () vortex com> Cc: dave () farber net Subject: Re: [IP] NYC will arrest for contraband in subway searches Lauren Weinstein wrote:
Suresh, I think the referenced NYT article hit the key points (including the airport analogy) pretty well. There is a big difference between a highly regulated environment like an airport, that is not essential to most persons' day to day lives, and mass transit ina city like NY, which is essential to most people on a continual basis.
I do agree. And I do agree that it is overreaction. But there are plenty of issues to raise without bringing constitutional law into it. Those amendments were written in days when there were no trains and planes. And they are ethical sentiments that really should be read in association with, and substantiated with other sections of the constitution. Their spirit, rather than the letter of the amendment, so to speak. I am not a fan of slippery slope arguments. And there are enough safeguards for any racial profiling, attempted or otherwise, to beimmeidately spotted and jumped hard on. Checks and balances are necessary.
Trust me, you haven't lived in a country like Israel or India (or probably not even the UK) where there is a significant experience with bomb blasts and other terrorist activity. After the initial overreaction, what is going to come out is a set of more practical and efficient methods, which hopefully will concentrate on keeping the system running smoothly [which automatically means causing the least inconvenience to legitimate travelers] while at the same time trying to keep hostiles out of the place. You can't even resort to racial profiling here - one of the people in the london bomb blasts was of african descent (well, west indian descent) rather than being an arab / pakistani etc like the other bombers. Profiling wouldnt have caught him. Nor would it have caught other crazies - like the white supremacists who bombed that Oklahoma federal building, or the Unabomber. This is going to net the police far more petty crooks and crack dealers than terrorists. Some additional security, but more passive security and observation + rapid response, rather than active searches, is definitely called for.
National ID (driver's license) cards. Searches on demand. PATRIOT Act going permanent. It looks more and more like Osama bin Laden's stated desire to trigger our own self-evisceration of our liberties is proceeding according to his master plan.
National ID is a fact of life, and a convenient one, sometimes, in several countries. Right now your SSN is that, by default. And in India we have voter ID cards for elections, PAN cards [permanent account number, that we use to file our tax returns, but which gets used as valid id proof for a whole lot of other things], etc. I would be careful about lumping everything under one big brother-ish agenda, while at the same time actively campaigning against gross abuse of civil rights (Gitmo, extraordinary rendition of travelers etc] ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on NYC will arrest for contraband in subway searches David Farber (Jul 22)