Interesting People mailing list archives
Should Municipalities Get in the Wi-Fi Business?
From: "Dave Farber" <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:57:06 -0500
------- Original message ------- From: Andrew Lippman <lip () media mit edu> Sent: 20/4/'05, 7:32 Most of the hackers who comment on municipal broadband are used to delving into the lower level code and hardware of anything that comes their way to tweak it and get it to work. To us, 802.11 is a license to explore. The beneficial result of this is turnkey Wifi, and a full catalogue of parts from which to choose. The bottom line is that anyone can be a broadband provider -- no IT department required. Same as not hiring a filmmaker for your daughter's Bat-Mitzvah. Jump in, the waters fine. A key reason why a city ought to think about this: the main difference between licensed and unlicensed radio is that for the former, the licenseholder is in the driver's seat. He has paid for the right to exclude others, and he is often supported by laws that favor letting him build a system. For unlicensed, the property owner is in charge. The radio works wherever you own the real estate on which to site your antennae. And the FCC is loathe to interfere with property rights. Recent exceptions expand the resident's rights (you can put Wifi in you apartment, the landlord cannot prevent it.) This is important for a city. Instead of leasing or selling the property, it can use its own. The alternative is having your city carve out places for private parties to do it. Would you lease the Grand Canyon to Verizon? Or would you rather the Park Service keep it and plant a few radios? Do you want your streets given away? Why not hold in common what we hold as a common good? As far as the comparisons with the motor vehicle department go, they are specious and not based in fact. Sure, it was once true that bureaucracies were terribly run and obstreperous. But Gore fixed that. The government really is re-engineered and far more responsive. There are many reasons, including outsourcing some functions, and that is not the point of this note. However, it is important to distinguish between pithy myth and reality. A city can run a network and has good reasons to consider it. Andy Lippman ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Should Municipalities Get in the Wi-Fi Business? David Farber (Apr 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Should Municipalities Get in the Wi-Fi Business? Dave Farber (Apr 20)
- Should Municipalities Get in the Wi-Fi Business? David Farber (Apr 20)