Interesting People mailing list archives
Dan Gillmor on Technology: Monday January 13,2003: Cartel's copy right control loosening]
From: David Farber <farber () tmail com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:35:48 -1000
-----Original Message----- From: Lynn <lynn () ecgincc com> To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>Subject: [Fwd: Dan Gillmor on Technology: Monday January 13,2003: Cartel's copy right control loosening]
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:18:38 -0500 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Dan Gillmor on Technology: Monday January 13,2003: Cartel's copy right control loosening Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:49:10 -0500 From: Dispatch Editor Silicon Valley <dispatch-svc () KNIGHTRIDDER COM> Reply-To: dispatch-feedback-svc () KNIGHTRIDDER COM To: DISP_SVC_GILLMOR_TEXT () DISPATCHES REALCITIES COM __________________________ S I L I C O N V A L L E Y . C O M http://www.siliconvalley.com/ DAN GILLMOR ON TECHNOLOGY Monday January 6, 2003 E-mail Dan at dgillmor () sjmercury com _____________________________ Cartel's copyright control loosening LAS VEGAS - For several days last week, the cavernous convention halls here became battlefields in the copyright wars. On balance, the entertainment cartel didn't seem to be doing very well. Some of the gadgets on display at the annual Consumer Electronics Show were surely the kinds of things that make the Hollywood studios and their music-industry allies cringe -- increasingly capable digital devices that, yes, can be tools for copyright infringement as well as legitimate uses. There are more hard-disk music and video recording and playback devices all the time, for example, and the disk capacities are doubling about every year. The gear I saw here paid lip service to the cartel's wish for absolute control over how copyrighted material may be used. So far, hard-disk music players can be connected to personal computers but not to each other, thereby requiring an intermediate step for anyone who wants to easily share files with someone else using the same kind of device. Still, it was evident that -- technologically speaking, at any rate -- tomorrow is not on the side of the copyright control freaks. Information doesn't want to be free, but customers definitely want it to. This show and the consumer-technology world it showcases are only one front, however. In the legal arena, we've also had some notable progress recently. Last week, a court in Norway acquitted teenager Jon Johansen on digital piracy charges. Johansen had written DeCSS, the software that let people view DVD movies on devices not authorized for DVD playback. The judge in the case, Irene Sogn, boiled down the issue nicely by observing the absurdity of convicting someone of breaking into his own property. Of course, Hollywood doesn't see a DVD as your property, except in the narrowest sense. The physical disk is yours, but you have only such rights to view or otherwise use what's on the disk as Hollywood is willing to grant -- in this case, extremely limited ones. Another sign of progress has been the slowly evolving stance of the music industry. Labels, recognizing the futility of what they've been doing, are making more and more music available online, even though the Internet services are deeply flawed. They haven't given up their wish for control, naturally. The record companies are trying a variety of new technological traps designed to keep us from making personal copies (which, yes, can be shared). Customers are not happy with this idea at all, and no one disputes that technological anti-copying measures eventually will be broken. The movie industry's hard line hasn't changed at all, even though it has put online a movie-download service that seems designed to alienate potential customers with its restrictions and lackluster quality. The studios, with the general support of the music people, are still openly angling for laws that would severely restrict technology and, in some cases, would allow copyright owners to hack networks where they suspected infringement was taking place. A notable aspect of this year's consumer-electronics show was the attention these issues are drawing. In previous years, copyright has been a topic of discussion. Now it's in the forefront of people's attention -- and it's about time. One of the few legislative heroes in this war, Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., told me two years ago that Congress had failed badly with the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That law, purportedly designed to draw an appropriate balance between copyright owners and the public interest, instead tilted overwhelmingly against the public. In another sign of progress, Boucher has been gaining congressional allies. Last week he and a colleague introduced a bill aimed at protecting our ``fair use'' rights in the digital age -- the rights, among others, to make personal copies of what we've bought and to quote from copyrighted material. Even more encouraging, he and other members who aren't owned outright by the cartel are hearing from a potentially influential lobby: the technology industry. At long last, tech companies are speakingup against the threat not just to their customers' rights but to their
own ability to innovate and sell products. The entertainment people are hardly discouraged. They have far more clout than any other parties in this war, and they've used it adeptly through the years. They will keep launching lawyers at anything that worries them, and they will reach into their deep pockets foryears to come in order to protect their threatened but still enormously
lucrative business model. But unless they can literally take control of technological progress, thwarting anything that remotely disturbs them no matter what the cost to the economy and our culture, they can't stop the tide.Maybe it's the new year. But for the first time in a while, I'm starting
to feel more optimistic. On at least this issue, the public interest might, just might, be making a comeback. ----- Dan Gillmor's column appears each Sunday, Wednesday and Saturday. Visit Dan's online column, eJournal at http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/ ----- FURTHER READING * Good Morning Silicon Valley http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/gmsv/ * Scott Herhold's Stocks.comment http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/scott_her hold/ * Mike Cassidy's SV Dispatches http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/mike_cass idy/ * Mike Langberg's Tech Test Drive http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/mike_lang berg/ * Matt Marshall's Term Sheet http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/matt_mars hall/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advertising: If you are interested in advertising in our newsletters, call Shawn Oliver at 408-938-6018 or send email to soliver () knightridder com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _____________________________ SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION ......................... This is a free e-mail Dispatch published by SiliconValley.com.Subscribe to Dispatches or edit your selections at any time by visiting
our Email Dispatches page: http://www.siliconvalley.com/edc/servlet/edcSubscriber?action=Q_REDIRECT&NEX T=EDIT_DISPATCH To unsubscribe from this mailing, send an email to listserv () dispatches realcities com with "Unsubscribe DISP_SVC_GILLMOR_TEXT" in the body field. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) 2002, SiliconValley.com.
K N I G H T R I D D E R > Information for Life
-- Dave ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To unsubscribe or update your address, click http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- Dan Gillmor on Technology: Monday January 13,2003: Cartel's copy right control loosening] David Farber (Jan 13)