Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Brenda Sandburg on Internet copyright case involving thumbnails, but also linking and framing
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:27:00 -0500
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:15:12 -0800 To: farber () dsl cis upenn edu From: Denise Caruso <caruso () hybridvigor org> Dear Dave,Don't know if you saw this yet. Forwarded to me from Center for the Public Domain, http://www.centerforthepublicdomain.org/.For the list if you'd like. Best, Denisehttp://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=la w/View&c=Article&cid=ZZZF07DWDXC&live=true&cst=1&pc=0&pa=0&s=News&ExpI gnore=true&showsummary=0Bigger Not Better With Copyrighted Web Photos Brenda Sandburg The Recorder February 7, 2002 Search engines can display "thumbnails," but not full-sized images of copyrighted works on their Web sites, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday. Setting parameters for copyright infringement on the Internet, the court found that reproducing photographs to create thumbnail images is a fair use of the material, but displaying full-sized images violates the copyright owner's exclusive right to publicly display his works. In Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 00-5521, a photographer claimed the search engine Arriba (now named Ditto.com) violated his copyright by reproducing and displaying images without permission. A lower court ruled that such use of Kelly's works was a fair use exception to the Copyright Act. Regarding the thumbnail images, the 9th Circuit said Arriba's use of Kelly's photographs was transformative -- improving access to information on the Internet -- and did not harm the market for Kelly's original images. But the court found that displaying the full-sized images through linking and framing was not transformative and harmed the market for the original photographs. "While it was necessary to provide whole images to suit Arriba's purpose of giving users access to the full-sized images without having to go to another site, such a purpose is not legitimate," Judge Thomas Nelson wrote. The 9th Circuit sent the case back to the district court to determine damages for copyright infringement and whether an injunction is necessary. "It's a validation of advancements in technology," said Arriba's counsel Jud ith Jennison, a partner in the San Francisco office of Seattle's Perkins Coie. She said there is no evidence that anyone accessed the full-sized images of Kelly's works through Arriba's site and that this would be relevant to the question of damages. Jennison also said the issue of inline linking and framing was not a key point to the case since Arriba had abandoned the practice years ago. But other IP attorneys regarded this as the crucial part of the 9th Circuit's ruling since it appears to be the first time an appellate court has addressed inline linking and framing. "This is a fascinating case," said Annette Hurst, a partner at Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin in San Francisco. "It's basically going to do away with linking or framing without permission." _______________________________________________ Random-bits mailing list Random-bits () lists essential org http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/random-bits-- Denise Caruso Founder & Executive Director The Hybrid Vigor Institute +1 415.543.8113 vox/fax http://hybridvigor.org
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: Brenda Sandburg on Internet copyright case involving thumbnails, but also linking and framing David Farber (Feb 08)