Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Brenda Sandburg on Internet copyright case involving thumbnails, but also linking and framing


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:27:00 -0500


Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:15:12 -0800
To: farber () dsl cis upenn edu
From: Denise Caruso <caruso () hybridvigor org>

Dear Dave,

Don't know if you saw this yet. Forwarded to me from Center for the Public Domain, http://www.centerforthepublicdomain.org/.

For the list if you'd like.

Best,
Denise

http://www.law.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=la w/View&c=Article&cid=ZZZF07DWDXC&live=true&cst=1&pc=0&pa=0&s=News&ExpI gnore=true&showsummary=0

 Bigger Not Better With Copyrighted Web Photos

Brenda Sandburg
The Recorder
February 7, 2002

Search engines can display "thumbnails," but not full-sized images of
copyrighted works on their Web sites, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled Wednesday.

Setting parameters for copyright infringement on the Internet, the court
found that reproducing photographs to create thumbnail images is a fair use
of the material, but displaying full-sized images violates the copyright
owner's exclusive right to publicly display his works.

In Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 00-5521, a photographer claimed the search
engine Arriba (now named Ditto.com) violated his copyright by reproducing
and displaying images without permission. A lower court ruled that such use
of Kelly's works was a fair use exception to the Copyright Act.

Regarding the thumbnail images, the 9th Circuit said Arriba's use of Kelly's
photographs was transformative -- improving access to information on the
Internet -- and did not harm the market for Kelly's original images.

But the court found that displaying the full-sized images through linking
and framing was not transformative and harmed the market for the original
photographs.

"While it was necessary to provide whole images to suit Arriba's purpose of
giving users access to the full-sized images without having to go to another
site, such a purpose is not legitimate," Judge Thomas Nelson wrote. The 9th
Circuit sent the case back to the district court to determine damages for
copyright infringement and whether an injunction is necessary.

"It's a validation of advancements in technology," said Arriba's counsel Jud
ith Jennison, a partner in the San Francisco office of Seattle's Perkins
Coie.

She said there is no evidence that anyone accessed the full-sized images of
Kelly's works through Arriba's site and that this would be relevant to the
question of damages. Jennison also said the issue of inline linking and
framing was not a key point to the case since Arriba had abandoned the
practice years ago.

But other IP attorneys regarded this as the crucial part of the 9th
Circuit's ruling since it appears to be the first time an appellate court
has addressed inline linking and framing.

"This is a fascinating case," said Annette Hurst, a partner at Howard, Rice,
Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin in San Francisco. "It's basically going to
do away with linking or framing without permission."

_______________________________________________
Random-bits mailing list
Random-bits () lists essential org
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/random-bits
--
Denise Caruso
Founder & Executive Director
The Hybrid Vigor Institute
+1 415.543.8113 vox/fax
http://hybridvigor.org

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: