Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: If you rush to your country's defense, will the country rush back?


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:13:59 -0500


From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>
[Note:  This item comes from reader Janos Gereben.  DLH]

At 16:03 -0800 12/10/01, Janos G. wrote:
From: "Janos G." <janos451 () earthlink net>
Subject: If you rush to your country's defense, will the country rush back?
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:03:37 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0

When JFK sent me "Greetings!" (on a postcard yet), I had *one week* to
report to Fort Dix for jungle warfare training in the -20F New Jersey
winter. Now that I need proof of that unpleasant but supposedly necessary
episode in my life, the Army says it's glad to comply in a mere *seven and a
half months.*

Now that a few years went by and I wanted to claim some VA benefits,
discharge certificates turned out to be insufficient, honorable as that
discharge was, I also have to produce DD-214, a piece of paper I managed to
misplace.

No matter: the DoD has a records center, so I wrote to them in October,
providing all kinds of numbers and pertinent data. Two months later, having
heard squat, I found an e-mail address and inquiried, politely. A reply
arrived today:

<<Your request was received at this Center on Oct. 11, 2001.  Current
turn-around-time is running approximately 30 weeks. Thank you for
contracting the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis.
center () stlouis nara gov>>

Next time the call comes, I'll just visit Canada, where winters are kinder
than in New Jersey, and government organizations - except the post office -
act more speedily.

PS: Here's a classic government screwup - in order to send that reply by
e-mail, a clerk had to look up my letter to provide the date of receipt.
With the letter in hand, it would have taken a couple of minutes to pull the
service record, about the same amount of time it took to let me know about
the 30-week wait.


For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: