Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Covad Blames Its Recent Troubles On Bells' Anticompetitive Tactics
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:46:12 -0400
Sender: rberger () imap ultradevices com Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:35:36 -0700 From: "Robert J. Berger" <rberger () ultradevices com> Organization: UltraDevices Inc. Covad Blames Its Recent Troubles On Bells' Anticompetitive Tactics By SHAWN YOUNG Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL Excerpt: <SNIP> Covad blames many of its difficulties on anticompetitive tactics by the Bells that it says slowed its progress and squandered its capital. "Most corporations don't have an attitude toward the law that you take six years to comply with it," says Dhruv Khanna, Covad's fiery general counsel and one of its founders. "It's death by a thousand cuts. It's do the bare minimum to appear to be complying with the law." Covad has filed antitrust suits against three of the four Bells. Last year, SBC Communications Inc. settled, paying $150 million for an equity stake and agreeing to buy $600 million in Covad services. The Bells deny trying to kill the rivals and say they have made great progress in opening their networks to them. Among the first places Covad tried to offer service was Menlo Park, Calif., a Silicon Valley town thick with the venture capitalists the company hoped to impress. Through 1997 and 1998, officials of SBC, the local phone provider, told Covad there was no space for its gear in an important SBC equipment hub. In the fall of 1998, Mr. Khanna requested that Covad and SBC submit a growing stack of disputes, including Menlo Park, to arbitration. A joint visit to the location was arranged. The Covad contingent and SBC's lawyers filed in to the building and the SBC attorneys went silent. "Literally, you could put a basketball court in there," recalls Tom Regan, the Covad official in charge of locating its equipment. At the arbitration hearing the following week, SBC began by announcing that there was space in Menlo Park after all. Arbitrators deemed the incident far from isolated and said SBC had acted in bad faith, delaying Covad by more than a year. Paul Mancini, SBC's assistant general counsel, declines to discuss the specifics of Menlo Park beyond saying the company "may have made a mistake." But he says the San Antonio company was doing all it could to open its network in the face of a huge surge in demand for its resources. "A lot of the issues were really start-up issues," says Mr. Mancini. "It has nothing to do with us foot-dragging." <snip> -- Robert J. Berger - UltraDevices, Inc. 257 Castro Street, Suite 223 Mt. View CA. 94041 Voice: 650-237-0334 VoiceMail: 408-882-4755 Fax: 408-490-2868 Email: rberger () ultradevices com http://www.ultradevices.com
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
Current thread:
- IP: Covad Blames Its Recent Troubles On Bells' Anticompetitive Tactics David Farber (Aug 10)